Event · Self · proverb; 1990s writing

Know With · 93

A Person Through Persons

A Nguni proverb says a person is a person through other persons. Twentieth-century writers make a philosophy of it. The proverb is older than the seminars.

  • Southern Africa, on the tongue and then on the page
  • Nguni speech, and late twentieth-century Southern African writing
Two stools and a shared clay bowl in morning light.
Generated interpretation. Not a village, not a slogan.

Plate · Generated interpretation

A proverb is not a person. What with were you already using?

Listen · Eve

0:00 / —:—

Umuntu ngumuntu ngabantu. A Nguni proverb. Desmond Tutu uses ubuntu in No Future Without Forgiveness (1999) around the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Mogobe Ramose writes philosophy. The Constitutional Court of South Africa invokes ubuntu in jurisprudence. These are later offices. The proverb is not a theory of phenomenal consciousness.

Source

Tutu, No Future Without Forgiveness. New York: Doubleday, 1999. Ramose, African Philosophy through Ubuntu (1999). Wiredu’s Akan conceptual decolonization is another West African project, not this proverb.

The house’s own title is to know with. It would be a theft to claim the Nguni proverb as our etymology. It would also be a refusal to notice a rhyme. Rhyme is not identity. Buber’s I and You is another grammar of with. Not one with.

Interpretation

To flatten all African thought into ubuntu is a later market. The proverb is specific. Personhood here is ethical and social before it is a Cartesian interior.

Question

Whether a person can be at all, alone, is a moral claim that may or may not be a claim about experience.

Distant echoes

Echo

Late twentieth-century Ghana · Legon, and on the page

Okra and the English inner

Wiredu asks what English inner hides. Ubuntu asks what a person is without persons. Not one Africa.

Echo

Interwar Europe · Germany and later Jerusalem, on the page

I and You

Buber’s with is a word between two. Ubuntu’s with is a making of a person. Keep the difference.

One question remains

Self · Who or what is having the experience?

If a person is a person through persons, is the inner life a late luxury, a real privacy, or a way of forgetting the through?