Science · Mind & body · 1991

Know With · 90

A Loop That Is Lived

A Chilean biologist, with a philosopher and a psychologist, argues that mind is not a picture in a head. It is an enactment in a body that is already a world.

  • Santiago, Paris, and the page of *The Embodied Mind*
  • Late twentieth-century cognitive science
  • 33.45°S 70.67°W
A loop of string on a desk in Andean light.
Fig. 90 · Generated interpretation. Not Varela’s study.

Plate · Generated interpretation

A loop that is not a circle drawn on paper. Where does the inside start?

Listen · Eve

0:00 / —:—

Francisco J. Varela, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch, The Embodied Mind (MIT Press, 1991). Autopoiesis (with Humberto Maturana) is in the background. Enaction: cognition as embodied action. Varela’s later “neurophenomenology” (Journal of Consciousness Studies, 1996) asks the laboratory to take first-person report as data, not as noise.

Source

Varela, Thompson, and Rosch, The Embodied Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1991. Varela, “Neurophenomenology,” Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (1996). Merleau-Ponty is an acknowledged ancestor, not a disguise.

Gibson’s handle is an ecological psychology of affordance. Varela’s loop is a biology of making a world. They rhyme. They are not one school. Buddhist mindfulness appears in the 1991 book as a method of first-person discipline. That use must not swallow the traditions it borrows from.

Interpretation

Embodiment can become a slogan. Here it is a research program: no inner cinema required, and no simple brain-in-a-vat.

Question

If the world is enacted, who, if anyone, is the enactor when the loop is running well?

Distant echoes

Echo

Late twentieth-century ecological psychology · Cornell, on the page

The handle

Gibson’s seeing is already a possible act. Varela’s knowing is already a living loop.

One question remains

Mind & body · How does experience live in matter?

If mind is a loop and not a picture, where does the inside start once the looping is the life?